--- title: "The relationship evidence register" language: en canonical: https://osint.v3rta.com/dossiers/accessibe/relationship-evidence/ as_of: 2026-10-10 --- # The relationship evidence register **Question.** What does each accepted graph connection actually mean? **Answer.** This register gives each accepted role, its source period and material qualifications. Association does not transfer an allegation or establish control. ## Ownership roles - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → accessiBe Inc.: Owns 100% of the US subsidiary. Period: April 2025 order; later ownership not independently checked. [s-d8] [s-d33] - Qualification: The ownership finding is stated in the consent order. The complaint’s broader common-enterprise and commingling allegations were not admissions by the companies. Earlier court submissions describing the Israeli company’s operations refer to an earlier period. - Response: The respondents neither admitted nor denied the complaint’s allegations apart from the jurisdictional facts admitted for the proceeding. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → accessiBe Inc.: Established the US subsidiary, according to the FTC complaint. Period: 2020. [s-d33] - Qualification: The ownership finding is stated in the consent order. The complaint’s broader common-enterprise and commingling allegations were not admissions by the companies. Earlier court submissions describing the Israeli company’s operations refer to an earlier period. - Response: The respondents neither admitted nor denied the complaint’s allegations apart from the jurisdictional facts admitted for the proceeding. - Attributed: K1 Investment Management → accessiBe Ltd.: Lead Series A investor. Period: May 2020–August 2022 rounds. [s-d19] [s-d24] [s-d29] [s-d48] [s-d74] [s-d79] [s-d108] [s-d306] - Qualification: These are announced and reported financing amounts, not audited cash balances or a company valuation. The exact Phoenix investing legal entity and the investors’ percentages are not established. - Attributed: Nadav Dakner → accessiBe Ltd.: Early private investor. Period: 2019 seed round. [s-d24] [s-d25] [s-d79] [s-d108] - Qualification: The retained material does not establish each investor’s amount, percentage or current holding. Later secondary sources repeat the early reporting. - Attributed: Oron Yaffe → accessiBe Ltd.: Early private investor. Period: 2019 seed round. [s-d24] [s-d25] [s-d79] [s-d108] - Qualification: The retained material does not establish each investor’s amount, percentage or current holding. Later secondary sources repeat the early reporting. - Attributed: Elad Mor → accessiBe Ltd.: Early private investor. Period: 2019 seed round. [s-d25] [s-d79] - Qualification: The retained material does not establish each investor’s amount, percentage or current holding. Later secondary sources repeat the early reporting. - Attributed: Itai Elizur → accessiBe Ltd.: Early private investor. Period: 2019 seed round. [s-d25] [s-d79] - Qualification: The retained material does not establish each investor’s amount, percentage or current holding. Later secondary sources repeat the early reporting. - Attributed: K1 Investment Management → accessiBe Ltd.: Minority investor according to contemporaneous reporting. Period: February 2021 report; percentage undisclosed. [s-d25] - Qualification: The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed. - Attributed: Glilot Capital Partners → accessiBe Ltd.: Participant in Series A extension. Period: August 2022; exact stake undisclosed. [s-d29] [s-d306] [s-d308] - Qualification: These are announced and reported financing amounts, not audited cash balances or a company valuation. The exact Phoenix investing legal entity and the investors’ percentages are not established. - Attributed: The Phoenix → accessiBe Ltd.: Participant in Series A extension; exact Phoenix entity unspecified. Period: August 2022. [s-d29] [s-d72] [s-d306] [s-d308] - Qualification: The shared corporate number supports the name history of that public company. It does not identify which group entity invested in accessiBe; the group label and the registered parent remain separate records. - Documented: R. Neil Malik → K1 Investment Management: Principal owner, as stated in the adviser brochure. Period: March 2022 brochure; later ownership unverified. [s-d52] - Qualification: K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates. - Attributed: Arik Kleinstein → accessiBe Ltd.: Personal investor, distinct from the Glilot fund. Period: February 2021 report. [s-d74] - Qualification: Kleinstein’s personal investment and the fund’s investment are distinct roles. The retained records do not disclose their percentages. - Documented: Sero Capital, LLC → AudioEye, Inc.: Shareholder with more than 10%. Period: AudioEye 2022 annual filing; later ownership unverified. [s-d197] - Qualification: This is context for the identified counterparty at the filing date. It establishes no ownership or management link between Moradi and accessiBe. - Attributed: Itai Elizur → accessiBe Ltd.: Investor and adviser according to business profile. Period: Date and present holding unverified. [s-d209] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Documented: INBOUNDJUNCTION LTD → MarketAcross: Registered owner of MARKETACROSS trademark. Period: Retained Israeli trademark record; later status unverified. [s-d212] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Nicholas A. Groat → Safe Life Defense, LLC: Owner according to business profile. Period: Retained profile; percentage unverified. [s-d213] - Qualification: These records help distinguish the customer organizations and their personnel. They do not establish the merits of the customers’ case against accessiBe. - Attributed: K1 Investment Management → accessiBe Ltd.: Listed portfolio investment. Period: Retained portfolio page at October 2026 cutoff. [s-d218] [s-d356] - Qualification: The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed. - Attributed: K1 Investment Management → Onit, Inc.: Listed portfolio investment. Period: Retained portfolio page. [s-d218] - Qualification: The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed. - Attributed: Nadav Dakner → accessiBe Ltd.: Investor and adviser according to profile. Period: Date and present holding unverified. [s-d247] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Elad Mor → accessiBe Ltd.: Investor and adviser according to profile. Period: From May 2019 in profile; present holding unverified. [s-d248] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Glilot Capital Partners → Guardz Cyber Ltd.: Listed investor. Period: Retained team page. [s-d294] - Qualification: Shared investors and an executive’s move do not establish a corporate transaction with accessiBe. The exact Phoenix investing entity and investment amounts remain unspecified. - Attributed: The Phoenix → Guardz Cyber Ltd.: Listed Phoenix investor; precise legal entity unspecified. Period: Retained team page. [s-d294] - Qualification: Shared investors and an executive’s move do not establish a corporate transaction with accessiBe. The exact Phoenix investing entity and investment amounts remain unspecified. - Documented: Level Access → UserWay: Acquired UserWay. Period: Completed 20 March 2024. [s-d307] [s-d326] - Qualification: Omission from a later material-litigation list could reflect completion or a materiality judgment; it does not prove a settlement or victory. UserWay’s own marketing claims are not proof of accessiBe’s product performance. - Attributed: Roy Gefen → accessiBe Ltd.: Early investor according to guest biography. Period: 2021 biography; stake unspecified. [s-d338] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. ## People roles - Attributed: Robert Lopez → accessiBe Ltd.: CEO appointed 6 May 2025. Period: From May 2025; retained announcement. [s-d11] [s-d13] [s-d101] [s-d102] [s-d169] - Qualification: The appointment and prior Justworks role are company statements. The retained record establishes no personal regulatory allegation against Lopez; shared or similar names are not identity evidence. - Attributed: Dekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Former CEO; continued board and strategy involvement announced. Period: May 2025 succession. [s-d13] - Qualification: The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection. - Attributed: Robert Lopez → Justworks: Former chief revenue officer; later adviser. Period: Before December 2024. [s-d13] [s-d169] - Qualification: The appointment and prior Justworks role are company statements. The retained record establishes no personal regulatory allegation against Lopez; shared or similar names are not identity evidence. - Attributed: Dekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Co-founder. Period: Foundation period. [s-d13] [s-d106] - Qualification: Titles changed over time; founder status does not establish a current executive office or an ownership percentage. - Attributed: Gal Vizel → accessiBe Ltd.: Co-founder. Period: Foundation period. [s-d13] [s-d106] - Qualification: Titles changed over time; founder status does not establish a current executive office or an ownership percentage. - Attributed: Shir Ekerling → accessiBe Ltd.: Co-founder. Period: Foundation period. [s-d13] [s-d106] [s-d217] - Qualification: Titles changed over time; founder status does not establish a current executive office or an ownership percentage. - Attributed: Shir Ekerling → accessiBe Ltd.: CEO or co-CEO in historical accounts. Period: 2020–2023 accounts; exact title dates conflict. [s-d24] [s-d48] [s-d73] [s-d100] [s-d168] [s-d216] [s-d224] [s-d277] - Qualification: A profile’s CEO end date in June 2022 conflicts with contemporary references to later CEO or co-CEO service. The record does not establish an exact continuous title history or a current executive role at accessiBe. - Attributed: Gal Vizel → accessiBe Ltd.: Marketing executive and co-founder. Period: Early business; secondary profile through March 2021. [s-d24] [s-d278] - Qualification: Profile dates are secondary accounts, not corporate appointment records. His later venture does not establish a transaction or ownership relationship between Diffi and accessiBe. - Attributed: Dekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Operations executive and co-founder. Period: Early business; secondary profile through June 2022. [s-d24] [s-d73] [s-d201] [s-d276] - Qualification: The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection. - Attributed: Mike Velcich → K1 Investment Management: Principal in the investment announcement. Period: May 2020. [s-d48] - Qualification: The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed. - Documented: R. Neil Malik → K1 Investment Management: CEO, as stated in the adviser brochure. Period: March 2022 brochure; present mandate unverified. [s-d50] - Qualification: K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates. - Attributed: Mike Velcich → K1 Investment Management: Vice president, according to a career profile. Period: From 2016; later titles differ. [s-d50] - Qualification: K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates. - Attributed: Kobi Samboursky → Glilot Capital Partners: Co-founder and managing partner. Period: Fund founded in 2011; present mandate unverified. [s-d57] - Qualification: Kleinstein’s personal investment and the fund’s investment are distinct roles. The retained records do not disclose their percentages. - Attributed: Arik Kleinstein → Glilot Capital Partners: Co-founder and managing partner. Period: Fund founded in 2011; present mandate unverified. [s-d57] [s-d74] [s-d262] - Qualification: Kleinstein’s personal investment and the fund’s investment are distinct roles. The retained records do not disclose their percentages. - Attributed: Michael Hingson → accessiBe Ltd.: Chief vision officer and sponsored podcast host. Period: Announced February 2021; own account October 2025. [s-d65] [s-d101] [s-d111] [s-d216] [s-d252] - Qualification: These are company and personal accounts. His connection with the NFB does not make that organization responsible for, or a general endorser of, accessiBe’s products. - Attributed: Michael Farlekas → accessiBe Ltd.: Executive chairman according to secondary profiles. Period: Profile dates role from November 2024. [s-d66] [s-d101] [s-d119] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Attributed: Michael Farlekas → Onit, Inc.: CEO; official announcement effective 1 March 2024. Period: 2024; January dates in other sources conflict. [s-d27] [s-d66] [s-d119] [s-d218] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Documented: Michael Farlekas → ContextLogic Inc.: Director and lead independent director. Period: April 2024 corporate filing; present mandate unverified. [s-d27] [s-d66] [s-d119] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Documented: Michael Farlekas → E2open: Former CEO. Period: 2015–10 October 2023; primary departure date. [s-d27] [s-d66] [s-d255] [s-d321] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Attributed: Dekel Skoop → Ykey: Co-founder and marketing executive according to profiles. Period: 2016–2019 profile dates. [s-d68] [s-d276] - Qualification: No retained registry extract establishes Ykey’s ownership percentages or legal continuity with accessiBe. - Attributed: Gal Vizel → Ykey: Co-founder and CEO according to profiles. Period: 2016–2019 profile dates. [s-d68] [s-d278] - Qualification: No retained registry extract establishes Ykey’s ownership percentages or legal continuity with accessiBe. - Attributed: Steve Faulkner → TetraLogical: Co-founder and director. Period: Retained professional biography. [s-d69] [s-d258] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Steve Faulkner → TPGi: Former chief accessibility officer. Period: Earlier career; date unspecified. [s-d69] [s-d258] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Steve Faulkner → Vision Australia: Former senior web accessibility consultant. Period: Earlier career; date unspecified. [s-d69] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Dekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Co-CEO named in financing coverage. Period: August 2022. [s-d72] - Qualification: The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection. - Attributed: Mike Velcich → accessiBe Ltd.: K1 board representative according to reporting. Period: May 2020 report; present mandate unconfirmed. [s-d73] - Qualification: The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed. - Attributed: Mike Velcich → K1 Investment Management: K1 representative on accessiBe's board, according to reporting. Period: 2020 report. [s-d73] - Qualification: The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed. - Attributed: Gal Vizel → accessiBe Ltd.: Chief revenue officer. Period: Historical sources; profile through January 2025. [s-d73] [s-d201] [s-d278] - Qualification: Profile dates are secondary accounts, not corporate appointment records. His later venture does not establish a transaction or ownership relationship between Diffi and accessiBe. - Attributed: Michael Farlekas → Roadnet Technologies, Inc.: Former executive at Roadnet. Period: 2012–2014 corporate biography. [s-d27] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Attributed: Michael Farlekas → RedPrairie Corporation: Former executive at RedPrairie. Period: 2001–2012 corporate biography. [s-d27] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Attributed: Nadav Dakner → MarketAcross: Founder or co-founder according to business profiles. Period: Retained profiles; present mandate unverified. [s-d104] [s-d247] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Elad Mor → MarketAcross: Co-founder and CEO according to business profiles. Period: Retained profiles; present mandate unverified. [s-d104] [s-d248] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Itai Elizur → MarketAcross: Co-founder and managing partner according to profiles. Period: Retained profiles; present mandate unverified. [s-d104] [s-d209] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Documented: Mark A. Riccobono → National Federation of the Blind: President named in FTC correspondence. Period: 2025; present mandate unverified. [s-d114] - Qualification: These letters document the comments and the FTC’s response, not agreement by all disability organizations or independent findings on every product feature. - Documented: Jason Taylor → UsableNet: Representative named in FTC correspondence. Period: 2025. [s-d114] - Qualification: These letters document the comments and the FTC’s response, not agreement by all disability organizations or independent findings on every product feature. - Documented: Dekel Skoop → accessiBe Inc.: CEO named in the consent package. Period: 2025; public signature lines blank. [s-d118] - Qualification: The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection. - Attributed: Dekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Former CEO. Period: Through May 2025 succession announcement. [s-d118] [s-d260] [s-d276] - Qualification: The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection. - Attributed: Michael Farlekas → Eagle Parent Holdings LLC: CEO according to a secondary career record. Period: Date and present mandate unverified. [s-d119] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Attributed: Michael Farlekas → E2open: Director of an E2open entity according to a secondary record. Period: Date and exact group company unverified. [s-d119] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Documented: Sherwin K. Parikh → Sherwin K. Parikh MD, P.C.: Authorized CEO in organizational provider record. Period: Retained provider record. [s-d155] - Qualification: These records help distinguish the customer organizations and their personnel. They do not establish the merits of the customers’ case against accessiBe. - Attributed: Robert Lopez → Groupon: Former general manager and managing director. Period: June 2011–May 2014 profile dates. [s-d169] - Qualification: The appointment and prior Justworks role are company statements. The retained record establishes no personal regulatory allegation against Lopez; shared or similar names are not identity evidence. - Documented: David Moradi → AudioEye, Inc.: CEO and director. Period: AudioEye 2022 annual filing; present mandate unverified. [s-d197] - Qualification: This is context for the identified counterparty at the filing date. It establishes no ownership or management link between Moradi and accessiBe. - Attributed: Itai Elizur → INBOUNDJUNCTION LTD: Co-founder according to business profile. Period: Retained profile. [s-d209] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Itai Elizur → Chainwire: Co-founder according to business profile. Period: Retained profile. [s-d209] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Mike Velcich → K1 Investment Management: Partner in later profiles and team page. Period: Later source dates; precise promotion date unverified. [s-d218] [s-d246] [s-d274] - Qualification: K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates. - Attributed: Josh Basile → accessiBe Ltd.: Community relations manager. Period: Retained company announcement. [s-d223] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. - Attributed: Sapir Yarden → accessiBe Ltd.: Nonprofit partnership program lead. Period: Retained company announcement. [s-d223] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. - Attributed: Yan Kotliarsky → accessiBe Ltd.: Vice president of marketing according to historical account. Period: 2020 account; later mandate unverified. [s-d216] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. - Attributed: Mike Velcich → FC Capital Management LLC: Former vice president. Period: 2014–2016 secondary profile. [s-d246] - Qualification: K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates. - Attributed: Mike Velcich → Adams Street Partners LLC: Former associate. Period: Earlier career; date unspecified. [s-d246] - Qualification: K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates. - Attributed: Mike Velcich → Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors LP: Former associate. Period: Earlier career; date unspecified. [s-d246] - Qualification: K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates. - Attributed: Nadav Dakner → INBOUNDJUNCTION LTD: Founder and CEO according to profile. Period: Retained profile. [s-d247] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Nadav Dakner → Chainwire: Co-founder and CEO according to profile. Period: Retained profile. [s-d247] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Elad Mor → INBOUNDJUNCTION LTD: Managing partner according to profile. Period: Retained profile. [s-d248] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Elad Mor → Chainwire: Co-founder according to profile. Period: From May 2019 in profile. [s-d248] - Qualification: These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain. - Attributed: Adrian Roselli → Algonquin Studios: Former co-founder and vice president. Period: 1998–2015 biography. [s-d251] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Documented: Andrew Appel → E2open: Appointed interim CEO and director. Period: 10 October 2023. [s-d255] [s-d302] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Documented: Chinh E. Chu → E2open: Board chairman in departure announcement. Period: October 2023; later mandate unverified. [s-d255] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Attributed: Roy Gefen → accessiBe Ltd.: Chief marketing officer in company/media accounts. Period: 2021 and later undated accounts; present mandate unverified. [s-d263] [s-d338] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. - Attributed: Masha Koski Zaks → accessiBe Ltd.: Vice president of brand. Period: January 2023 announcement; present mandate unverified. [s-d273] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. - Attributed: Shir Ekerling → accessiBe Ltd.: President according to secondary career profile. Period: March 2024–May 2025. [s-d277] - Qualification: A profile’s CEO end date in June 2022 conflicts with contemporary references to later CEO or co-CEO service. The record does not establish an exact continuous title history or a current executive role at accessiBe. - Attributed: Gil Magen → accessiBe Ltd.: Head of marketing communications. Period: From November 2021 in profile. [s-d216] [s-d308] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. - Attributed: Gal Vizel → Diffi Technologies Ltd.: Co-founder according to secondary profile. Period: Later profile; start date unverified. [s-d289] - Qualification: Profile dates are secondary accounts, not corporate appointment records. His later venture does not establish a transaction or ownership relationship between Diffi and accessiBe. - Attributed: Shir Ekerling → Diffi Technologies Ltd.: Co-founder according to secondary profile. Period: Later profile; start date unverified. [s-d289] - Qualification: A profile’s CEO end date in June 2022 conflicts with contemporary references to later CEO or co-CEO service. The record does not establish an exact continuous title history or a current executive role at accessiBe. - Attributed: Dekel Skoop → Guardz Cyber Ltd.: Chief business officer on company team page. Period: Retained undated team page. [s-d294] - Qualification: Shared investors and an executive’s move do not establish a corporate transaction with accessiBe. The exact Phoenix investing entity and investment amounts remain unspecified. - Attributed: Yaniv Aronowich → accessiBe Ltd.: Former legal leader; described as CLO or vice president. Period: 2021–May 2026 accounts. [s-d303] [s-d325] - Qualification: The retained records do not fix exact appointment dates. The April 2025 article was labelled sponsored content and is a company-authored interpretation of the Hidalgo case, not independent judicial analysis. - Attributed: Niv Penso → accessiBe Ltd.: Chief technology officer in retained profile. Period: Source date; present mandate unverified. [s-d308] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. - Attributed: Haim Repael Azoulay → accessiBe Ltd.: Vice president of design in retained profile. Period: Source date; present mandate unverified. [s-d308] - Qualification: These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record. - Attributed: Yaniv Aronowich → Epstein Rosenblum Maoz: Joined as partner. Period: May 2026 report. [s-d325] - Qualification: The retained records do not fix exact appointment dates. The April 2025 article was labelled sponsored content and is a company-authored interpretation of the Hidalgo case, not independent judicial analysis. ## Business roles - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Arnon, Tadmor-Levy: Client in the K1 financing transaction. Period: 2021. [s-d19] - Qualification: The retained records do not fix exact appointment dates. The April 2025 article was labelled sponsored content and is a company-authored interpretation of the Hidalgo case, not independent judicial analysis. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Yaniv Aronowich: Client of transaction counsel. Period: 2021. [s-d19] - Qualification: The retained records do not fix exact appointment dates. The April 2025 article was labelled sponsored content and is a company-authored interpretation of the Hidalgo case, not independent judicial analysis. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Routier: Reported acquisition of Routier or its team. Period: July 2021 / June 2022; unresolved date and deal form. [s-d28] [s-d106] - Qualification: The accounts give July 2021 and June 2022 as different transaction dates. No retained transaction agreement resolves the date, whether shares or assets were acquired, or the consideration. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Webdesigner Depot: Alleged buyer of paid promotional review. Period: September 2020; FTC complaint allegation. [s-d33] - Qualification: The complaint is an allegation source, and it does not identify the unnamed agency as MarketAcross, InboundJunction or any investor’s business. - Response: accessiBe denied the FTC’s allegations and criticized the investigation’s testing and historical information. - Outcome: The final consent order regulates representations of independent endorsements and material-connection disclosures without an admission of the complaint’s allegations. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → uxplanet.org: Alleged buyer of paid promotional review. Period: September 2020; FTC complaint allegation. [s-d33] - Qualification: The complaint is an allegation source, and it does not identify the unnamed agency as MarketAcross, InboundJunction or any investor’s business. - Response: accessiBe denied the FTC’s allegations and criticized the investigation’s testing and historical information. - Outcome: The final consent order regulates representations of independent endorsements and material-connection disclosures without an admission of the complaint’s allegations. - Attributed: Haben Girma → National Federation of the Blind: Former legal representative in accessibility litigation. Period: Historical professional biography. [s-d70] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Documented: ContextLogic Inc. → Qoo10 Inc.: Sold operating assets. Period: 2024 corporate disclosure. [s-d27] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → David A. Hidalgo, M.D., P.C.: Reported widget supplier to the medical practice. Period: Company account of the January 2025 decision. [s-d147] [s-d182] - Qualification: The judgment does not name accessiBe or accessWidget and does not certify a branded product. The broader remediation record, rather than the widget alone, supported the mootness analysis. The company’s claim that no customer lost because of its widget is narrower than, and not disproved merely by, a denied dismissal motion. - Response: The company credits its tool and litigation-support team; its marketing account remains distinct from what the judgment actually says. - Outcome: The customer won dismissal on jurisdictional grounds; there was no trial determination of universal widget compliance. - Attributed: Dillon Music → accessiBe Inc.: Widget customer and plaintiff. Period: 2024–2026 customer action. [s-d124] - Qualification: The March 2026 opinion recounts allegations accepted as true for the dismissal motion. It does not adjudicate their truth or prove that the widget caused a lawsuit. - Response: accessiBe disputed liability and relied on contractual limitations and the defined scope of technical support. - Outcome: Most causes of action were dismissed; the narrower compliance-representation contract theory remained. - Attributed: Safe Life Defense, LLC → accessiBe Inc.: Former widget customer and plaintiff. Period: 2024–2026 customer action. [s-d124] - Qualification: The March 2026 opinion recounts allegations accepted as true for the dismissal motion. It does not adjudicate their truth or prove that the widget caused a lawsuit. - Response: accessiBe disputed liability and relied on contractual limitations and the defined scope of technical support. - Outcome: Most causes of action were dismissed; the narrower compliance-representation contract theory remained. - Attributed: accessiBe Inc. → SoulFlora Inc.: Supplier identified by purchase invoice. Period: Retained customer docket. [s-d164] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → American Dental Associates, LTD.: Reported accessWidget supplier to a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. [s-d178] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Exit 9 Brooklyn, Inc.: Reported accessWidget supplier to a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. [s-d178] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Attributed: accessiBe Inc. → Buffalo Jackson Trading Co., LLC: Reported plugin supplier to a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. [s-d178] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Pure Green NYC Wholesale Corp.: Reported widget supplier to a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. [s-d178] [s-d184] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → The Spice & Tea Exchange Distribution, LLC: Supplier of a report offered in customer litigation. Period: December 2024 decision; mootness request denied. [s-d184] [s-d198] - Qualification: accessiBe was not a party. This decision concerns the submitted proof and procedural burden in one client’s case, not a general damages judgment against the vendor. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → U.S. Wings, Inc.: Reported accessibility technology supplier. Period: Historical litigation record. [s-d184] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Grace Products, Inc.: Accessibility consultant in customer's litigation record. Period: September 2021 decision; mootness request denied. [s-d184] [s-d202] - Qualification: The court held that the defendant had not met the demanding mootness burden. It did not decide every product claim or impose liability on nonparty accessiBe. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Lemongrass Holdings LLC: Reported accessibility-audit supplier. Period: Historical litigation record. [s-d184] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → PhotonLight.com, Inc.: Associated with customer's audit evidence; authorship of wrong-site report not established. Period: October 2024 decision. [s-d199] - Qualification: accessiBe was not a party. The wrong-site submission does not, by itself, establish whether the vendor generated the wrong document or the litigant submitted it. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → BigCommerce: Strategic sales partner in venue submissions. Period: 2021–2022 litigation record. [s-d201] - Qualification: The names identify reported commercial roles at those dates. They do not establish ownership, present contracts, responsibility for product claims or wrongdoing by the partners. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Volusion: Strategic sales partner in venue submissions. Period: 2021–2022 litigation record. [s-d201] - Qualification: The names identify reported commercial roles at those dates. They do not establish ownership, present contracts, responsibility for product claims or wrongdoing by the partners. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Upright Technologies, Inc.: Reported widget supplier. Period: Historical customer account. [s-d216] - Qualification: The settlement agreements and all pleadings are not retained here. Settlement is not a merits judgment, and accessiBe was not the defendant in those customer cases. - Response: accessiBe denied that Eyebobs and Masterbuilt used its product at the disputed times. Later, accessiBe said Eyebobs declined support, while Eyebobs said its requests for meetings went unanswered and it had stopped using accessiBe. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Masterbuilt Manufacturing, LLC: Reported plugin supplier. Period: September 2020 customer record. [s-d216] - Qualification: The settlement agreements and all pleadings are not retained here. Settlement is not a merits judgment, and accessiBe was not the defendant in those customer cases. - Response: accessiBe denied that Eyebobs and Masterbuilt used its product at the disputed times. Later, accessiBe said Eyebobs declined support, while Eyebobs said its requests for meetings went unanswered and it had stopped using accessiBe. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → UserWay: Commercial competitor in public comparisons. Period: 2021 and later accounts. [s-d216] [s-d298] [s-d361] - Qualification: Omission from a later material-litigation list could reflect completion or a materiality judgment; it does not prove a settlement or victory. UserWay’s own marketing claims are not proof of accessiBe’s product performance. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Eyebobs, LLC: Supplier to a former customer. Period: Historical critical account. [s-d216] - Qualification: The settlement agreements and all pleadings are not retained here. Settlement is not a merits judgment, and accessiBe was not the defendant in those customer cases. - Response: accessiBe denied that Eyebobs and Masterbuilt used its product at the disputed times. Later, accessiBe said Eyebobs declined support, while Eyebobs said its requests for meetings went unanswered and it had stopped using accessiBe. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Digital Ocean: Named commercial partner. Period: May 2020 announcement. [s-d216] - Qualification: The names identify reported commercial roles at those dates. They do not establish ownership, present contracts, responsibility for product claims or wrongdoing by the partners. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → eSSENTIAL Accessibility: Commercial competitor criticized by eSSENTIAL over overlay claims. Period: Historical public debate. [s-d315] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. ## Legal roles - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → accessiBe Inc.: Co-respondents in the FTC consent proceeding. Period: 2025. [s-d8] [s-d113] [s-d115] - Qualification: The WCAG provision allows non-misleading claims supported by competent and reliable evidence; it is not a blanket prohibition on the product or all compliance claims. The order requires payment, while the retained record does not establish actual payment or completed consumer refunds. - Response: The respondents neither admitted nor denied the complaint’s allegations, apart from the jurisdictional admissions. - Outcome: The January proposal became a final order following public comments. Its term is generally 20 years, subject to the order’s specified provisions. - Documented: National Federation of the Blind → accessiBe Ltd.: Submitted comments supporting FTC action. Period: 2025 FTC public-comment process. [s-d114] - Qualification: These letters document the comments and the FTC’s response, not agreement by all disability organizations or independent findings on every product feature. - Documented: UsableNet → accessiBe Ltd.: Submitted comments supporting FTC action. Period: 2025 FTC public-comment process. [s-d114] - Qualification: These letters document the comments and the FTC’s response, not agreement by all disability organizations or independent findings on every product feature. - Documented: Accessible Web, Inc. → accessiBe Ltd.: Submitted comments supporting FTC action. Period: 2025 FTC public-comment process. [s-d114] - Qualification: These letters document the comments and the FTC’s response, not agreement by all disability organizations or independent findings on every product feature. - Documented: Adrian Roselli → accessiBe Ltd.: Submitted comments on the FTC proceeding. Period: 2025. [s-d114] - Qualification: These letters document the comments and the FTC’s response, not agreement by all disability organizations or independent findings on every product feature. - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → Kirkland & Ellis LLP: Client represented in the FTC consent proceeding. Period: 2025. [s-d118] - Qualification: The WCAG provision allows non-misleading claims supported by competent and reliable evidence; it is not a blanket prohibition on the product or all compliance claims. The order requires payment, while the retained record does not establish actual payment or completed consumer refunds. - Response: The respondents neither admitted nor denied the complaint’s allegations, apart from the jurisdictional admissions. - Outcome: The January proposal became a final order following public comments. Its term is generally 20 years, subject to the order’s specified provisions. - Documented: accessiBe Inc. → Sherwin K. Parikh MD, P.C.: Defendant in customer's proposed class action. Period: Filed 2024; contract claim survived March 2026. [s-d124] [s-d125] [s-d152] [s-d168] [s-d229] [s-d353] - Qualification: Survival of a claim is not a finding of liability or class certification. The retained docket records an answer filed on 25 June 2026; the answer’s contents are not retained, and the docket may lag the official court file. - Response: accessiBe sought dismissal and relied on its terms of service; most of the pleaded claims were dismissed. - Outcome: No final merits judgment, class certification or approved $1.2 million settlement is established by the retained record. - Documented: accessiBe Inc. → Dillon Music: Defendant in customer's proposed class action. Period: Filed 2024; contract claim survived March 2026. [s-d124] [s-d125] [s-d152] [s-d229] - Qualification: Survival of a claim is not a finding of liability or class certification. The retained docket records an answer filed on 25 June 2026; the answer’s contents are not retained, and the docket may lag the official court file. - Response: accessiBe sought dismissal and relied on its terms of service; most of the pleaded claims were dismissed. - Outcome: No final merits judgment, class certification or approved $1.2 million settlement is established by the retained record. - Documented: accessiBe Inc. → Safe Life Defense, LLC: Defendant in customer's proposed class action. Period: Filed 2024; contract claim survived March 2026. [s-d124] [s-d229] - Qualification: Survival of a claim is not a finding of liability or class certification. The retained docket records an answer filed on 25 June 2026; the answer’s contents are not retained, and the docket may lag the official court file. - Response: accessiBe sought dismissal and relied on its terms of service; most of the pleaded claims were dismissed. - Outcome: No final merits judgment, class certification or approved $1.2 million settlement is established by the retained record. - Documented: Lainey Feingold → accessiBe Ltd.: Submitted comments supporting FTC action. Period: 2025. [s-d114] - Qualification: These letters document the comments and the FTC’s response, not agreement by all disability organizations or independent findings on every product feature. - Documented: Karl Groves → accessiBe Ltd.: Submitted comments on the FTC proceeding. Period: 2025. [s-d114] - Qualification: These letters document the comments and the FTC’s response, not agreement by all disability organizations or independent findings on every product feature. - Documented: David A. Hidalgo, M.D., P.C. → Nihal Erkan: Defendant in website-accessibility action. Period: 2023–January 2025; dismissed for standing and mootness. [s-d147] [s-d266] - Qualification: The judgment does not name accessiBe or accessWidget and does not certify a branded product. The broader remediation record, rather than the widget alone, supported the mootness analysis. The company’s claim that no customer lost because of its widget is narrower than, and not disproved merely by, a denied dismissal motion. - Response: The company credits its tool and litigation-support team; its marketing account remains distinct from what the judgment actually says. - Outcome: The customer won dismissal on jurisdictional grounds; there was no trial determination of universal widget compliance. - Documented: accessiBe Inc. → Blank Rome LLP: Client represented in the customer class action. Period: 2024–2026 docket. [s-d152] - Qualification: A docket’s administrative cause-of-action category is not a fraud finding. Use of another case as authority does not combine the proceedings or establish shared liability. - Attributed: Dillon Music → Pedro Liz: Defendant in a separate accessibility action. Period: May 2024 reported filing. [s-d157] - Qualification: These records help distinguish the customer organizations and their personnel. They do not establish the merits of the customers’ case against accessiBe. - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → AudioEye, Inc.: Defendant in patent litigation. Period: 2020–2022; cases subsequently settled. [s-d164] [s-d200] [s-d201] [s-d227] - Qualification: The reported mutual covenants not to sue and freedom-to-operate arrangement resolved disputes without a disclosed financial amount. Settlement and procedural venue rulings do not establish the merits of either side’s infringement or advertising allegations. - Response: accessiBe defended AudioEye’s cases, asserted counterclaims and filed its own Delaware patent action. - Outcome: The parties announced a global settlement; patent-board termination requests accompanied closure of the court proceedings. - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → AudioEye, Inc.: Defendant and counterclaimant. Period: 2021–2022; subsequently settled. [s-d164] - Qualification: The reported mutual covenants not to sue and freedom-to-operate arrangement resolved disputes without a disclosed financial amount. Settlement and procedural venue rulings do not establish the merits of either side’s infringement or advertising allegations. - Response: accessiBe defended AudioEye’s cases, asserted counterclaims and filed its own Delaware patent action. - Outcome: The parties announced a global settlement; patent-board termination requests accompanied closure of the court proceedings. - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → AudioEye, Inc.: Applicant for transfer-related relief. Period: 2021–2022; reconsideration ultimately granted. [s-d164] [s-d184] [s-d200] - Qualification: These are historical venue facts and party submissions, not proof of current infrastructure or adjudicated marketing liability. All substantive disputes were later reported settled. - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → AudioEye, Inc.: Plaintiff in separate patent litigation. Period: June–October 2022; subsequently settled. [s-d164] - Qualification: The reported mutual covenants not to sue and freedom-to-operate arrangement resolved disputes without a disclosed financial amount. Settlement and procedural venue rulings do not establish the merits of either side’s infringement or advertising allegations. - Response: accessiBe defended AudioEye’s cases, asserted counterclaims and filed its own Delaware patent action. - Outcome: The parties announced a global settlement; patent-board termination requests accompanied closure of the court proceedings. - Documented: accessiBe Inc. → Urbani Truffles USA Corporation: Third-party defendant in customer's action. Period: Retained docket; merits outcome not established. [s-d164] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → AudioEye, Inc.: Patent-board petitioner. Period: 2022; termination requested following settlement. [s-d166] - Qualification: The reported mutual covenants not to sue and freedom-to-operate arrangement resolved disputes without a disclosed financial amount. Settlement and procedural venue rulings do not establish the merits of either side’s infringement or advertising allegations. - Response: accessiBe defended AudioEye’s cases, asserted counterclaims and filed its own Delaware patent action. - Outcome: The parties announced a global settlement; patent-board termination requests accompanied closure of the court proceedings. - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → AudioEye, Inc.: Party to global settlement. Period: 24 October 2022 announcement. [s-d167] [s-d197] - Qualification: The reported mutual covenants not to sue and freedom-to-operate arrangement resolved disputes without a disclosed financial amount. Settlement and procedural venue rulings do not establish the merits of either side’s infringement or advertising allegations. - Response: accessiBe defended AudioEye’s cases, asserted counterclaims and filed its own Delaware patent action. - Outcome: The parties announced a global settlement; patent-board termination requests accompanied closure of the court proceedings. - Attributed: Shir Ekerling → DL1961 Premium Denim, Inc.: Declarant supporting a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. [s-d170] - Qualification: These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement. - Documented: accessiBe Inc. → Yaniv Aronowich: Company whose citizenship declaration was filed by counsel. Period: 25 March 2026 docket entry. [s-d229] - Qualification: A docket’s administrative cause-of-action category is not a fraud finding. Use of another case as authority does not combine the proceedings or establish shared liability. - Documented: accessiBe Ltd. → UserWay: Respondent in comparative-advertising litigation. Period: March 2021 interim order; final outcome unestablished. [s-d297] [s-d298] [s-d299] - Qualification: This was an interim decision, not a final damages judgment. UserWay’s requested NIS 2.8 million was a pleaded demand. The order required UserWay security of NIS 60,000 and awarded NIS 10,000 plus VAT in legal costs; the retained OCR has reversed Hebrew segments. - Response: accessiBe defended the publications as true, cited customer lawsuits and challenged UserWay Ltd.’s standing; the court rejected the standing objection while reserving merits issues. - Outcome: The final outcome of the principal Israeli claim and any counterclaim is not established by the retained evidence. ## Associations roles - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → National MS Society: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained undated company page. [s-d13] - Qualification: The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → United Cerebral Palsy: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained undated company page. [s-d13] [s-d102] - Qualification: The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Special Olympics USA Games: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained undated company page. [s-d13] [s-d102] - Qualification: The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Disability Foundation: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained undated company page. [s-d13] - Qualification: The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → National Federation of the Blind: Subject of the NFB's criticism of overlay claims. Period: 2021; secondary date corrected against primary statement. [s-d25] [s-d179] [s-d263] - Qualification: The primary statement dates the revocation to 2021; a secondary account’s 2020 date is incorrect. The apology does not establish a renewed sponsorship or NFB approval of the product. - Response: The company’s later account emphasizes listening to the disability community and a change in its marketing approach. - Outcome: The retained record includes the apology but does not establish restoration of convention sponsorship. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Steve Faulkner: Subject of accessibility criticism. Period: Historical public debate. [s-d25] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Haben Girma: Subject of accessibility criticism. Period: Historical public debate. [s-d25] [s-d263] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Mike Velcich: Recipient of investment commentary by K1 representative. Period: 2021 financing announcement. [s-d32] - Qualification: The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Overlay False Claims: Subject of criticism concerning advertising claims. Period: Historical public debate. [s-d33] [s-d179] - Qualification: Many individual allegations are commentary, copied screenshots or summaries whose underlying platform records were not retained. They are not treated as additional regulatory findings or as proof that a particular investor’s agency ran a campaign. Criticism of the size of the FTC payment is opinion. - Response: The company disputed several accounts and later apologized for its approach to community criticism; the FTC settlement involved no admission of its allegations. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Parkinson's Foundation: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained company page. [s-d102] - Qualification: The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here. - Attributed: Michael Hingson → National Federation of the Blind: Previous work and braille-literacy ambassador role. Period: Historical personal biography. [s-d111] [s-d252] - Qualification: These are company and personal accounts. His connection with the NFB does not make that organization responsible for, or a general endorser of, accessiBe’s products. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Overlay Fact Sheet: Subject of the Overlay Fact Sheet's criticism. Period: Retained community statement. [s-d168] [s-d215] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → Adrian Roselli: Subject of criticism about claimed JAWS collaboration. Period: Historical public debate. [s-d179] - Qualification: These reports concern particular tests, user experiences or secondhand studies, not a fresh technical audit of current accessWidget. The original supplier denial, privacy assessment and every cited study are not retained. No privacy-law violation is established. - Response: Ekerling acknowledged in a reported 2023 interview that the overlay was not a perfect solution; he also denied user tracking or selling data. Earlier responses disputed critics’ testing and explained increased automated-checker counts as a consequence of code changes. - Attributed: National Federation of the Blind → accessiBe Ltd.: Revoked accessiBe's convention sponsorship. Period: 22 June 2021. [s-d180] [s-d315] - Qualification: The primary statement dates the revocation to 2021; a secondary account’s 2020 date is incorrect. The apology does not establish a renewed sponsorship or NFB approval of the product. - Response: The company’s later account emphasizes listening to the disability community and a change in its marketing approach. - Outcome: The retained record includes the apology but does not establish restoration of convention sponsorship. - Attributed: Overlay Fact Sheet → Steve Faulkner: Signed by Steve Faulkner. Period: Retained signatory list. [s-d215] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Overlay Fact Sheet → Adrian Roselli: Signed by Adrian Roselli. Period: Retained signatory list. [s-d215] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Overlay Fact Sheet → Karl Groves: Signed by Karl Groves. Period: Retained signatory list. [s-d215] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Overlay Fact Sheet → Lainey Feingold: Signed by Lainey Feingold. Period: Retained signatory list. [s-d215] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Vispero → accessiBe Ltd.: Reported denial of claimed collaboration. Period: Secondary critical account; original denial not retained. [s-d216] - Qualification: These reports concern particular tests, user experiences or secondhand studies, not a fresh technical audit of current accessWidget. The original supplier denial, privacy assessment and every cited study are not retained. No privacy-law violation is established. - Response: Ekerling acknowledged in a reported 2023 interview that the overlay was not a perfect solution; he also denied user tracking or selling data. Earlier responses disputed critics’ testing and explained increased automated-checker counts as a consequence of code changes. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → National Federation of the Blind: Company apology published in the organization's journal. Period: May 2023. [s-d216] - Qualification: The primary statement dates the revocation to 2021; a secondary account’s 2020 date is incorrect. The apology does not establish a renewed sponsorship or NFB approval of the product. - Response: The company’s later account emphasizes listening to the disability community and a change in its marketing approach. - Outcome: The retained record includes the apology but does not establish restoration of convention sponsorship. - Attributed: Michael Farlekas → Mike Velcich: Appointment was publicly commented on by K1 partner. Period: Onit announcement in 2024. [s-d218] - Qualification: The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → United Spinal Association: Partner and Tech Access Council member according to company announcement. Period: October 2024. [s-d223] - Qualification: The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here. - Attributed: Gal Vizel → Dekel Skoop: Fellow co-founder of accessiBe. Period: Historical founding association. [s-d201] - Qualification: Titles changed over time; founder status does not establish a current executive office or an ownership percentage. - Attributed: Haben Girma → Overlay Fact Sheet: Signatory. Period: Retained signatory list. [s-d215] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Accessible Web, Inc. → Overlay Fact Sheet: Employees appear among signatories; no blanket corporate endorsement inferred. Period: Retained signatory list. [s-d215] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: National Federation of the Blind → Overlay Fact Sheet: A branch official appears among signatories; no blanket corporate endorsement inferred. Period: Retained signatory list. [s-d215] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Shir Ekerling → Adrian Roselli: Subject of criticism by Roselli. Period: Historical public debate. [s-d216] - Qualification: Many individual allegations are commentary, copied screenshots or summaries whose underlying platform records were not retained. They are not treated as additional regulatory findings or as proof that a particular investor’s agency ran a campaign. Criticism of the size of the FTC payment is opinion. - Response: The company disputed several accounts and later apologized for its approach to community criticism; the FTC settlement involved no admission of its allegations. - Attributed: Karl Groves → Overlay Fact Sheet: Creator of the fact-sheet site. Period: March 2021 account. [s-d216] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Adrian Roselli → World Wide Web Consortium: Working-group participant. Period: Retained professional biography. [s-d251] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: Steve Faulkner → World Wide Web Consortium: Working-group participant and specification editor. Period: Retained professional biography. [s-d258] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → The Third Place for Kids: Nonprofit program partner. Period: April 2025 counterpart announcement. [s-d260] - Qualification: The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → World Wide Web Consortium: Membership announced by the company. Period: February 2021 announcement; current membership unverified. [s-d216] - Qualification: The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement. - Response: In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product. - Attributed: accessiBe Ltd. → United Spinal Association: Premier Corporate Member; not described here as highest tier. Period: Retained counterpart membership page. [s-d352] - Qualification: The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here. ## Sources - [s-d8] Federal Trade Commission retained record 8, Federal Trade Commission - [s-d33] Federal Trade Commission retained record 33, Federal Trade Commission - [s-d19] Other source · s-d19 - [s-d24] Media source · s-d24 - [s-d29] Media source · s-d29 - [s-d48] Other source · s-d48 - [s-d74] Media source · s-d74 - [s-d79] Media source · s-d79 - [s-d108] Media source · s-d108 - [s-d306] Other source · s-d306 - [s-d25] Media source · s-d25 - [s-d308] Other source · s-d308 - [s-d72] Media source · s-d72 - [s-d52] Investment Adviser Public Disclosure retained record 52, Investment Adviser Public Disclosure - [s-d197] Company statement source · s-d197 - [s-d209] Other source · s-d209 - [s-d212] Israel Ministry of Justice retained record 212, Israel Ministry of Justice - [s-d213] Other source · s-d213 - [s-d218] Company statement source · s-d218 - [s-d356] Company statement source · s-d356 - [s-d247] Other source · s-d247 - [s-d248] Other source · s-d248 - [s-d294] Company statement source · s-d294 - [s-d307] Media source · s-d307 - [s-d326] Company statement source · s-d326 - [s-d338] Media source · s-d338 - [s-d11] Company statement source · s-d11 - [s-d13] Company statement source · s-d13 - [s-d101] Other source · s-d101 - [s-d102] Other source · s-d102 - [s-d169] Other source · s-d169 - [s-d106] Other source · s-d106 - [s-d217] Other source · s-d217 - [s-d73] Media source · s-d73 - [s-d100] Company statement source · s-d100 - [s-d168] Other source · s-d168 - [s-d216] Other source · s-d216 - [s-d224] Other source · s-d224 - [s-d277] Other source · s-d277 - [s-d278] Other source · s-d278 - [s-d201] Court record source · s-d201 - [s-d276] Other source · s-d276 - [s-d50] Other source · s-d50 - [s-d57] Other source · s-d57 - [s-d262] Other source · s-d262 - [s-d65] Other source · s-d65 - [s-d111] Media source · s-d111 - [s-d252] Other source · s-d252 - [s-d66] Other source · s-d66 - [s-d119] Other source · s-d119 - [s-d27] Company statement source · s-d27 - [s-d255] Other source · s-d255 - [s-d321] Media source · s-d321 - [s-d68] Other source · s-d68 - [s-d69] Other source · s-d69 - [s-d258] Other source · s-d258 - [s-d104] Other source · s-d104 - [s-d114] Federal Trade Commission retained record 114, Federal Trade Commission - [s-d118] Federal Trade Commission retained record 118, Federal Trade Commission - [s-d260] Other source · s-d260 - [s-d155] US National Plan and Provider Enumeration System retained record 155, US National Plan and Provider Enumeration System - [s-d246] Other source · s-d246 - [s-d274] Company statement source · s-d274 - [s-d223] Other source · s-d223 - [s-d251] Other source · s-d251 - [s-d302] US Securities and Exchange Commission retained record 302, US Securities and Exchange Commission - [s-d263] Media source · s-d263 - [s-d273] Media source · s-d273 - [s-d289] Other source · s-d289 - [s-d303] Media source · s-d303 - [s-d325] Media source · s-d325 - [s-d28] Media source · s-d28 - [s-d70] Other source · s-d70 - [s-d147] Court record source · s-d147 - [s-d182] Court record source · s-d182 - [s-d124] Court record source · s-d124 - [s-d164] Court record source · s-d164 - [s-d178] Court record source · s-d178 - [s-d184] Court record source · s-d184 - [s-d198] Court record source · s-d198 - [s-d202] Court record source · s-d202 - [s-d199] Court record source · s-d199 - [s-d298] Court record source · s-d298 - [s-d361] Other source · s-d361 - [s-d315] Media source · s-d315 - [s-d113] Federal Trade Commission retained record 113, Federal Trade Commission - [s-d115] Federal Trade Commission retained record 115, Federal Trade Commission - [s-d125] Court record source · s-d125 - [s-d152] Other source · s-d152 - [s-d229] Court record source · s-d229 - [s-d353] Court record source · s-d353 - [s-d266] Court record source · s-d266 - [s-d157] Media source · s-d157 - [s-d200] Court record source · s-d200 - [s-d227] Media source · s-d227 - [s-d166] US Patent and Trademark Office retained record 166, US Patent and Trademark Office - [s-d167] Other source · s-d167 - [s-d170] Court record source · s-d170 - [s-d297] Court record source · s-d297 - [s-d299] Other source · s-d299 - [s-d179] Other source · s-d179 - [s-d32] Company statement source · s-d32 - [s-d215] Other source · s-d215 - [s-d180] Other source · s-d180 - [s-d352] Other source · s-d352